State ex rel. Cody v. Board of Commissioners
State ex rel. Cody v. Board of Commissioners
Opinion of the Court
This is an application for a mandamus to compel the defendants to draw a warrant in favor of the relators
The defendants in their answer admit the facts stated in the petition to be true, but say that at the date aforesaid there were outstanding registered warrants of said county unpaid for at least double the amount of moneys then in the treasury, to which the holders of said warrants were then entitled by virtue of said registration, and that the defendants at the date aforesaid had drawn more than fifty per cent of the'levy for the general fund for the year 1879, and that under the revenue law, which took effect September 1, 1879, they have no authority to draw said amount in excess of the fifty per cent of said levy. The facts stated in the answer are admitted to be true.
Section 34 of the act “ concerning counties and county officers,” approved March 1, 1879,'and which took effect Sept. 1, 1879, provides that “it shall not be lawful for any warrant to be issued for any amount
Section 36 provides that “ any warrant drawn after fifty per cent of the amount levied for the year is exhausted, and where there are no funds in the treasury for the payment of the same, shall -not be chargeable as against the county, but may be collected by civil action from the county board making the same, or any member thereof.”
Section 1 of the act for the registration of warrants, provides “ that all warrants upon the state treasurer, the treasurer of any county, any or municipal corporation therein, shall be paid in the order of their presentation.” [Gen. Stat., 891.]
Sections 2 and 3 provide for the registration of warrants.
/Section 4 provides that “ it shall be the duty of every such treasurer to put aside in a separate and sealed package the money for the payment of each registered warrant in the order of its registration, as soon as money sufficient for the payment of such warrant is received, to the credit of the particular fund upon which the same is drawn. Such package shall be indorsed with the number and description of such warrant, and the name and address of the person in whose name the same is registered; and interest upon
It will he seen that no warrant can he drawn after fifty per cent of the amount levied for the year is exhausted, unless there is money in the treasury to the credit of the proper fund for the payment of the same, and that warrants can only be paid in the order of the entry of the account upon the record. And these provisions apply to all accounts audited by the county commissioners. The authority of the board of county commissioners is derived entirely from the statute, and such hoard has no authority to draw warrants upon the treasury except in pursuance of express statutory authority. They are absolutely prohibited from drawing warrants in excess of fifty per cent of the levy, and are personally liable upon any warrants drawn in excess of that amount. As fifty per cent of the levy for 1879 is exhausted, and there being no funds in the treasury upon which to di;aw the warrant sought for, the writ must he denied.
Writ denied.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- State, ex rel. Addison E. Cody and William West v. The Board of Commissioners of Colfax County
- Status
- Published