Miller v. Mesick
Miller v. Mesick
Opinion of the Court
This action was brought in the county court of Kearney county upon a promissory note, of which the following is a copy:
“Minden, Neb., Oct. 4th, 1880.
“On or before the 4th day of October, 1881, I promise to pay to the order of Hans Miller the sum of $35, for value received, at ten per cent from date.
“W. B. Miller.”
On which was the following guaranty:
“For value received I guarantee the within to T. M. Mesick.
“Hans Miller.”
The defendant Miller demurred to the bill of particulars upon the ground that the causes of action were improperly joined. The demurrer was sustained. Mesick thereupon took the case on error to the district court, where the judgment was reversed and the cause set down for trial. The plaintiff brings the cause into this court by petition in error.
The same practice would prevail on the trial of this case
Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.