Bliss v. Benedict
Nebraska Supreme Court
Bliss v. Benedict, 24 Neb. 346 (Neb. 1888)
Maxwell, Other
Bliss v. Benedict
Opinion of the Court
The questions presented in this case are substantially the same as in Peru Plow & Wheel Co., just decided, an additional ground of attachment being that defendant had absconded so that summons could not be served upon him, etc. The proof entirely fails to sustain this charge, or any of the charges set forth in the affidavit.
The judgment of the district court is right, and is affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- D. P. Bliss, in error v. D. M. Benedict, in error
- Status
- Published