Bliss v. Benedict

Nebraska Supreme Court
Bliss v. Benedict, 24 Neb. 346 (Neb. 1888)
Maxwell, Other

Bliss v. Benedict

Opinion of the Court

Maxwell, J.

The questions presented in this case are substantially the same as in Peru Plow & Wheel Co., just decided, an additional ground of attachment being that defendant had absconded so that summons could not be served upon him, etc. The proof entirely fails to sustain this charge, or any of the charges set forth in the affidavit.

The judgment of the district court is right, and is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

The other judges concur.

Reference

Full Case Name
D. P. Bliss, in error v. D. M. Benedict, in error
Status
Published