Stone v. Neeley
Stone v. Neeley
34 Neb. 81; 51 N.W. 314; 1892 Neb. LEXIS 78
Cases that cite this one
3 later published cases cite this decision.
- Hoffman v. Reinke Manufacturing Co. (Neb. 1987)
- Denslow v. Dodendorf (Neb. 1896)
- Seven Valleys Bank v. Smith (Neb. 1895)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
This case cannot be reviewed for the reason that the record contains no final judgment. A verdict was returned for the defendant in error, assessing her damages at $708.75. A motion for a new trial was filed by the plaintiff in error. The journal entry is as follows:
“Now on this 17th day of October, 1889, this cause coming on to be heard, the defendant George W. Stone’s motion for a new trial was overruled, to which ruling the defendant George W. Stone excepts, and has forty days to prepare a bill of exceptions. It is ordered that judgment be rendered on the verdict for plaintiff.”
This is merely a recital that a judgment was rendered by the court upon the verdict. (Miller v. B. & M. R. Co., 7 Neb., 227. The petition in error is
Dismissed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.