Sioux County v. Jameson
Cases that cite this one
11 later published cases cite this decision.
- Mitchell v. County of Clay (Neb. 1903)
- Beadle v. Harmon (Neb. 1936)
- State Ex Rel. Robertson Inv. Co. v. Patterson (Wyo. 1934)
- City of Atlanta v. Blackman Health Resort Inc. (Ga. 1922)
- Hazelet v. Holt County (Neb. 1897)
- Lincoln Township v. Kearney County (Neb. 1907)
- Taylor v. Davey (Neb. 1898)
- Gage County v. Hill (Neb. 1897)
- Stenberg v. State (Neb. 1896)
- Cuming County v. Thiele (Neb. 1896)
- Heald v. Polk County (Neb. 1895)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
It appears from the record that the defendant was, during the years of 1887, 1888, and 1889, county clerk of Sioux county; that he had, when it was necessary in the performance of the duties of his office, employed and paid an assistant, or clerk, and presented bills for the amounts paid such clerk or assistant to the county commissioners in the shape of claims, which were allowed, and warrants drawn on, and paid from, the general fund. The claims so allowed and paid amounted in the aggregate to $98. To recover such amount the plaintiff instituted this action in the county court of Sioux county, where it was awarded a judgment therefor. The defendant appealed to the district court, and on October 31, 1891, the plaintiff filed its petition, to which the defendant interposed a general demurrer, which was, on hearing, sustained, and the plaintiff elected to abide by its petition, and plead no further. The action was dismissed, and the plaintiff has brought the case to this court by an error proceeding to obtain a review of the action of the district court.
The petition raises the question, could the county commissioners allow a claim for the service of a clerk or an assistant to the county clerk and order the amount of the claim paid from the general fund of the county? This was for them to determine at the time the claims were presented for their examination and allowance or disallowance,
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.