Losure v. Miller
Cases that cite this one
4 later published cases cite this decision.
- Smith v. Silver (Neb. 1899)
- Albers v. City of Omaha (Neb. 1898)
- Wollam v. Brandt (Neb. 1898)
- Shaw v. Robinson & Stokes Co. (Neb. 1897)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
This is an action to recover damages for an alleged malicious prosecution. There was a trial to the court, a jury being waived, with findings and judgment for the plaintiff. The defendant prosecutes a petition in error to this court.
But a single proposition is discussed in the briefs, and that is the evidence in the case is insufficient to sustain the findings and judgment; and this question cannot be considered by this court, for the reason the record fails to disclose that a ruling of the trial court was made upon the motion for a new trial. (Hull v. Miller, 6 Neb., 128; Smith v. Spaulding, 34 Neb., 128; Scroggin v. National Lumber Co., 41 Neb., 195.) The judgment is
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.