Nebraska Supreme Court, 1896

Reynolds v. City of Tecumseh

Nebraska Supreme Court · Decided June 3, 1896 · Norval

48 Neb. 785; 67 N.W. 792; 1896 Neb. LEXIS 145

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

Root v. SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 25 OF CUSTER COUNTY (Neb. 1968)
Hall v. Patterson (Fla. 1903)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Norval, J.

This was an action to recover damages for personal injuries received by the plaintiff. Upon a trial of the issues to a jury a verdict was returned for the defendant. Plaintiff presented to the court a motion for a new trial, *786which was overruled, and the following judgment was rendered, as shown by the journal entry: “It is therefore considered by the court that the said defendant recover of the said Nate Reynolds its costs herein expended, as heretofore by the verdict of the jury found.” This is merely a judgment for costs, and not a final adjudication disposing of the case. (Little v. Gamble, 47 Neb., 827, and cases there cited.) The record failing to show a final judgment, the petition in error is

Dismissed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.