Merle & Heaney Manufacturing Co. v. Wallace
Cases that cite this one
9 later published cases cite this decision.
- Burroughs Corp. v. JAMES E. SIMON CONSTRUCTION CO. (Neb. 1974)
- State v. Taylor (Neb. 1965)
- Otteman v. Interstate Fire and Casualty Company (Neb. 1960)
- Aetna Building & Loan Ass'n v. Williams (Okla. 1910)
- Continental Trust Co. v. Peterson (Neb. 1906)
- Wunrath v. Peoples Furniture & Carpet Co. (Neb. 1915)
- Trimble v. M. V. Corey & Son (Neb. 1910)
- Rose v. Dempster Mill Manufacturing Co. (Neb. 1903)
- Merle & Heaney Manufacturing Co. v. Wallace (Neb. 1896)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
There was originally a judgment rendered by the district court of Douglas county in favor of plaintiff against the defendants upon a promissory note made by defendants to plaintiff. Inethis note there was a power of attorney authorizing any attorney at law to appear and to confess judgment. There waS an appearance and answer by an attorney for the defendants, whereby was confessed plaintiff’s cause of action as alleged and its right to a recovery as prayed. This attorney had no other authority than was conferred by the provisions of the note, and therefore this judgment was at the same term it was rendered set aside on motion of the defendants, who were given thirty days within which to answer. These proceedings in error are brought to reverse this order.
It is provided by section 582 of the Code of Civil Procedure that “A judgment rendered or final order made by the district court may be reversed, vacated, or modified by the supreme court for errors appearing on the record.” In the section immediately preceding that above quoted is the following language: “An order affecting a sub
Dismissed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.