Stuart v. Burcham
Cases that cite this one
4 later published cases cite this decision.
- Raymond v. Smith (Neb. 1935)
- Amos v. Eichenberger (Neb. 1922)
- Beatrice Savings Bank v. Beatrice Chautauqua Assembly (Neb. 1898)
- Cole v. Arlington State Bank (Neb. 1898)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
The district court of Lancaster county adjudged that certain of the purchase price of lands sold by Henry Bureham should be paid by the purchaser to Ambrose P. S. Stuart and Charles Holland, as creditors of said Bureham. The wife of Henry Bureham, who unsuccessfully claimed by her cross-petition that this balance should be paid to her as a creditor of her husband, brings this case into this court for review upon appeal. The petition has been examined and found to state a cause of ac
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.