Bastedo v. Boyd County
Bastedo v. Boyd County
Opinion of the Court
Boyd county was organized by act of tbe legislature in 1891. (See Session Laws 1891, ch. 20.) George T. Bastedo was in November of said 'year elected tbe first county clerk of said Boyd county, and qualified and entered upon tbe discharge of his duties as such officer. A part of the territory embraced in .Boyd county was prior to its organization attached to or a part of Holt county. Bastedo procured from the proper officer of Holt county transcripts of all deeds, mortgages, and judgments which were liens upon the lands detached from ITolt and attached to Boyd county, and caused these transcripts to be properly ..entered in the records of the new county of Boyd. For the performance of these services Boyd county paid him. Bastedo also made a numerical index, in which he entered the transcripts talYn from Holt county, and in this numerical index lryde 2,751 entries or transcripts, and filed a claim against Boyd county for fifteen cents for each one of the entries in the numerical index, amounting to the sum of $412.(55. The county board of'Boyd county disallowed this claim and Bastedo appealed to the district court, which rendered a judgment denying Bastedo’s claim. To review this judgment he prosecutes here a petition in error.
We are at a loss to understand upon what theory the judgment of the district court is based. By section 17 of an act of the legislature which went into force on September 1, 1879 (see Session Laws 1879, p, 358), the first county clerk of any new county was required to procure and record in books prepared for that purpose transcripts of all deeds, mortgages, leases, etc., affecting-lands in the new county which were of record in the old
Reversed and remanded.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- G. T. Bastedo v. Boyd County
- Status
- Published