State ex rel. Donnell v. Offill
Cases that cite this one
2 later published cases cite this decision.
- Dunbar v. Cronin (Ariz. 1917)
- State ex rel. O'Gara v. Furley (Neb. 1914)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Writ of mandamus allowed. Opinion to be filed later.
The following opinion was filed December 6, 1905:
This is an original application for a mandamus against the county clerk of Buffalo county to compel him to receive and file the nomination of relator to the office of supervisor for the sixth district of said county. The county clerk refused to receive and file the certificate upon the sole ground that there could be no election of supervisor at the ensuing election, because section 1, chapter 54, laws of 1905, provides: βThe supervisors selected and ap
Other objections Avere made to the constitutionality of the act, but it is not thought that their discussion here Avould be of permanent value.
The peremptory AVrit Avas alloAved as prayed.
Dissenting Opinion
dissenting.
I dissent for the reasons given in State v. Plasters, ante, p. 652.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.