Nebraska Supreme Court, 1919

Cross v. Prohaska

Nebraska Supreme Court · Decided February 1, 1919 · Rose

103 Neb. 146; 170 N.W. 665; 1919 Neb. LEXIS 15

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Bednar v. Bednar (Neb. 1946)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Rose, J.

This is an action to recover a commission of $500 for the sale of land. From a judgment on a verdict in favor of defendants, plaintiff has appealed.

The assignments of error are based on misconduct of a witness and of the jury. The evidence has not been preserved by a bill of exceptions, and without the evidence the merits of the assignments cannot be determined. What purports to be a bill of exceptions was filed in this court, but it was not allowed as *147such by the trial judge or authenticated by the clerk of the district court. It must therefore he disregarded on appeal. Dugger v. Smith, 94 Neb. 552; Gay v. Reynolds, 57 Neb. 194.

Apeirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.