Armstrong v. City National Bank
Armstrong v. City National Bank
115 Neb. 270; 213 N.W. 372; 1927 Neb. LEXIS 48
Armstrong v. City National Bank
Opinion of the Court
The court has carefully considered the assignments of error and the evidence in the record. Under the evidence no conclusions could be arrived at with reason other than that there is no liability on the part of the defendant bank. The jury were fully warranted in arriving at the verdict and the errors assigned could not have been prejudicially erroneous.
The judgment of the district court is
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.