Nebraska Supreme Court, 1930

Carlson v. Moore

Carlson v. Moore
Nebraska Supreme Court · Decided January 8, 1930 · Day, Dean, Eberly, Foster, Good, Rose, Thompson
119 Neb. 856; 228 N.W. 937; 1930 Neb. LEXIS 20

Carlson v. Moore

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

This is an action to recover damages for malpractice, in which plaintiff alleged that defendant was careless and negligent 'in the operation of an X-ray used in treatment for the cure of eczema. The jury found for plaintiff in the sum of $4,175, and from a judgment entered thereon by the district court for Dawson county, defendant has appealed.

*857We have carefully examined the record and find it to be free from prejudicial error. The judgment of the district court is therefore

Affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.