Nebraska Supreme Court, 1968

State v. Duncan

State v. Duncan
Nebraska Supreme Court · Decided February 9, 1968 · White, Carter, Spencer, Boslaugh, Smith, McCown, Newton
156 N.W.2d 165; 182 Neb. 598; 1968 Neb. LEXIS 437 (North Western Reporter, Second Series)

State v. Duncan

Opinion

McCown, J.

The defendant pleaded guilty to a charge of forgery. *599 After presentence investigation and report, sentence was pronounced. A subsequent letter from the defendant to the district judge was treated as a motion to vacate sentence under the Post Conviction Act, and the State ordered to show cause why relief should not be granted. After return to the show cause order, the court found that the defendant’s motion, and the files and records of the court showed to the satisfaction of the court that the defendant was entitled to no relief; denied an evidentiary hearing; and overruled the motion. Counsel was not appointed in this proceeding.

The defendant’s motion, pleadings, and briefs, do not even indicate any facts whatever which could conceivably constitute any denial or infringement of his constitutional rights in any respect. The defendant’s motion and the files and records of the case conclusively establish that the defendant was entitled to no relief. The appeal has no merit. See State v. Ronzzo, 181 Neb. 16, 146 N. W. 2d 576.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.