State v. Ryan
Cases that cite this one
2 later published cases cite this decision.
- State v. Cordell (Neb. 1975)
- State v. Temple (Neb. 1974)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
This is an appeal from a conviction for burglary. The sole assignment of error is that the evidence is insufficient to sustain the conviction. We affirm the judgment of the district court.
A motion for new trial Was not filed- in this case. “In order to obtain- a review of alleged errors occurring during the trial, such errors must b'é pointed out to the trial court in a motion'for a new trial and a ruling obtáined thereon.” State v. Stanosheck, 186 Neb. 17, 180 N. W. 2d 226. See, also, Kennedy v. State, 170 Neb. 193, 101 N. W. 2d 853.
A review of the record in this case reveals ample evidence to sustain the verdict of guilty. “In a criminal case this court will not interfere with a verdict of guilty based upon the evidence unless it is so lacking in .probative force, that we can say as a matter of law that it is insufficient to support a finding of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.” , State v. Goodwin, 184 Neb. 537, 169 N. W. 2d 270.
The judgment of the district 'Court is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.