Smith v. Vitek
Smith v. Vitek
Opinion of the Court
Plaintiff, Larry E. Smith, appeals from the District Court’s denial of his request for a writ of mandamus to compel the State to discharge him from custody under the provisions of Laws 1975, L. B. 567. The sole issue presented is whether the provisions of L. B. 567 have retroactive application. We held in Johnson and Cunningham v. Exon, ante p. 154, 256 N. W. 2d 869 (1977), that they do if approved by the Board of Pardons. That case decides this issue and is controlling herein.
We reverse the judgment herein and remand the
Reversed and remanded.
Concurring Opinion
concurring in result only.
I concur in the result only. See my concurring opinion in Johnson and Cunningham v. Exon, ante p. 154, 256 N. W. 2d 869.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Larry E. Smith v. Joseph C. Vitek
- Status
- Published