Mays v. Mays

Nebraska Supreme Court
Mays v. Mays, 223 Neb. 123 (Neb. 1986)
388 N.W.2d 118; 1986 Neb. LEXIS 1182
Boslaugh, Caporale, Grant, Hastings, Krivosha, Shanahan, White

Mays v. Mays

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Having reviewed the record de novo, which we are required to do, we find the action of the trial court in its division of both nonmarital and marital assets and the awarding of alimony to be fair and reasonable under the circumstances and not the result of an abuse of discretion. Applegate v. Applegate, 219 Neb. 532, 365 N.W.2d 394 (1985); Rockwood v. Rockwood, 219 Neb. 21, 360 N.W.2d 497 (1985); Guggenmos v. Guggenmos, 218 Neb. 746, 359 N.W.2d 87 (1984); Reuter v. Reuter, 218 Neb. 732, 359 N.W.2d 78 (1984); Van Newkirk v. Van Newkirk, 212 Neb. 730, 325 N.W.2d 832 (1982).

Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Reference

Full Case Name
Frances Marlene Mays v. Harold C. Mays
Status
Published