Nebraska Supreme Court, 1987

Anderson v. Gunter

Anderson v. Gunter
Nebraska Supreme Court · Decided June 12, 1987 · Boslaugh, Caporale, Grant, Hastings, Krivosha, Shanahan, White
225 Neb. 637; 407 N.W.2d 202; 1987 Neb. LEXIS 929

Anderson v. Gunter

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

In a declaratory judgment action brought by Leonard R. Anderson, the district court for Lancaster County held that the Nebraska Department of Correctional Services lacked authority to withhold credit for meritorious good time, see Neb. Rev. Stat. § 83-1,107(1) (Cum. Supp. 1974), earned before Anderson violated his mandatory parole. On appeal by the State, the parties stipulated that the only issue involved in *638the present case is the same as the question answered in Wounded Shield v. Gunter, ante p. 327, 405 N.W.2d 9 (1987), filed by this court on May 1, 1987. The parties have further stipulated that the decision in Wounded Shield v. Gunter, supra, controls disposition in the case now before us.

In Wounded Shield v. Gunter, supra, we stated: “[CJreditfor meritorious behavior which had been earned before Wounded Shield’s release on mandatory parole may be forfeited or withheld, after reincarceration for violation of mandatory parole.” Ante p. 335, 405 N.W.2d at 14.

Therefore, we hold that credit for meritorious behavior which had been earned before Anderson’s release on mandatory parole may be forfeited or withheld, after reincarceration for violation of mandatory parole.

The judgment of the district court is reversed, and this matter is remanded to the district court with direction to enter judgment for the appellants herein, consistent with our opinion rendered in Wounded Shield v. Gunter, supra, and in accordance with this opinion.

Reversed and remanded with direction.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.