McCombs v. Prenosil
McCombs v. Prenosil
226 Neb. 839; 415 N.W.2d 453; 1987 Neb. LEXIS 1078
McCombs v. Prenosil
Opinion of the Court
The appellant’s brief in these cases contains no assignments of error. Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-1919 (Reissue 1985) and the rules of this court, Neb. Ct. R. of Prac. 9D(l)d (rev. 1986), require that each error assigned shall be separately stated in an appellant’s brief. In the absence of an assignment of error, the judgment will be affirmed, unless the court notes plain error on the record. Baggett v. City of Omaha, 220 Neb. 805, 373 N.W.2d 391 (1985).
Since the records in these cases fail to disclose plain error, the judgments are affirmed.
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.