Toomire v. Town & Country Janitorial
Toomire v. Town & Country Janitorial
Opinion
Toomire v. Town & Country Janitorial CV-01-24-B 03/30/01
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
Michael Toomire
v. Civil No. 01-24-B Opinion N o . 2001DNH067 Town & Country Janitorial Services, Inc., et al.
O R D E R
I respond to defendants’ motion for judgment on the
pleadings as follows:
1. Plaintiff’s Title VII claims against Paul Thompson and
Daniel Thompson (Counts I and II) must be dismissed because a
Title VII claim cannot be maintained against a co-employee. See
March v . Technical Employment Servs., Inc.,
2000 DNH 055, 7-8. A
different result is not warranted here merely because Daniel
Thompson is the president and a shareholder of the employer.
2. Plaintiff’s claims based on
N.H. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 354-A
(Counts III and IV) must be dismissed because this statute does
not provide a private cause of action. See Bergstrom v . Univ. of
New Hampshire,
943 F. Supp. 13 0 , 132 n.3 (D.N.H. 1996).
3. Plaintiff’s wrongful discharge claim (Count V ) must be dismissed because plaintiff cannot maintain a wrongful discharge
claim for conduct that is actionable under Title VII. See Smith
v . F.W. Morse & Co.,
76 F.3d 413, 429(1st Cir. 1996).
4. Defendant Town & Country challenges plaintiff’s breach
of contract (Count VI) and unpaid wages (Count VII) claims. Town
& Country’s challenges to those claims cannot be resolved by
reference to the pleadings. Accordingly, defendant’s motion to
dismiss these claims is denied without prejudice.
In summary, Counts I and II are dismissed as to Paul
Thompson and Daniel Thompson. Counts I I I , IV, and V are
dismissed in their entirety. Defendant’s motion to dismiss
Counts VI and VII is denied without prejudice.
SO ORDERED.
Paul Barbadoro Chief Judge
March 3 0 , 2001
cc: Jennifer A . Lemire, Esq. Christopher W . Keenan, Esq. Martha Van Oot, Esq.
-2-
Reference
- Cited By
- 1 case
- Status
- Published