Sanchez v. United States
Sanchez v. United States
Opinion
Sanchez v. United States 10-CV-210-SM 06/29/10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
Augustin H. Sanchez, Petitioner
v. Case No. 10-cv-210-SM Opinion No.
2010 DNH 107United States of America, Respondent
O R D E R
Petitioner's motion for relief under the provisions of
28 U.S.C. § 2255must be dismissed as untimely.
Judgment was entered in the underlying criminal case on
February 11, 2009, and became final on February 23, 2009.
Petitioner had one year from that date to seek relief under
Section 2255. He did not sign the petition, however, until May
26, 2010, (presumably he also gave the petition to prison
officials on that date for mailing). Since the petition was not
filed within one year of petitioner's conviction becoming final,
it must be dismissed. See
28 U.S.C. § 2255(1) .
In any event, even if the petition had been timely filed, i
would be dismissed for lack of merit. Petitioner claims that hi
plea of guilty to, and subsequent conviction of, possessing a
firearm in furtherance of a drug trafficking crime was due to a
"misapplication" of
18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1)(A). That is not so. Petitioner admitted, under oath, during his plea colloquy that he
knowingly and intentionally possessed the handgun and rifle at
issue in furtherance of a conspiracy to distribute in excess of
100 kilograms of marijuana. Search warrants executed at
petitioner's home and at a stash house, resulted in recovery of
the firearms from the stash house, and documents from
petitioner's home establishing his connection to, and
constructive possession of those firearms. The prosecutor
proffered those facts as supporting the charge, and petitioner
agreed they were true and correct — including that the proximity
of the firearms to the drugs and location at the stash house
established their use in furtherance of the conspiracy. Finally,
petitioner stipulated to forfeiture of those firearms as
contraband used in the conspiracy. The provisions of 18 U.S.C.
924(c)(1)(A) were not misapplied in petitioner's case.
The petition is dismissed.
SO ORDERED.
Sj?even J./McAuliffe Chief Judge
June 2 9, 2 010
cc: Augustin H. Sanchez, pro se Aixa Maldonado-Quinones, AUSA
2
Reference
- Status
- Published