Mullen v. Kissell

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Martha Mullen v. Case No. 20-cv-00347-PB Edward J. Kissell, Jr. ORDER AMENDED Having construed the plaintiff’s Motion for Extension (doc. no. 3), and Motion for Contempt (doc. no. 4) as objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, and after due consideration of the objections filed, I herewith approve the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Andrea K.

Johnstone dated March 26, 2020 . “‘[O]nly those issues fairly raised by the objections to the magistrate's report are subject to review in the district court and those not preserved by such objection are precluded on appeal.’” School Union No. 37 v. United Nat'l Ins. Co., 617 F.3d 554, 564 (1st Cir. 2010) (quoting Keating v. Secretary of Health & Human Servs., 848 F.2d 271, 275 (1st Cir. 1988)); see also United States v. Valencia- Copete, 792 F.2d 4, 6 (1st Cir. 1986) (after proper notice, failure to file a specific objection to magistrate's report will waive the right to appeal). _P_a_u_l_ _B_a_r_b_a_d_o_r_o_ _____________ United States District Judge Date: April 13, 2020 cc: Martha Mullen, pro se