Lorfils v. FCI Berlin, Warden
Lorfils v. FCI Berlin, Warden
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Lynden Garfield Lorfils v. Case No. 19-cv-748-PB FCI Berlin, Warden
ORDER No objection having been filed, I herewith approve the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Andrea K. Johnstone dated April 20, 2020 . “‘[O]nly those issues fairly raised by the objections to the magistrate's report are subject
to review in the district court and those not preserved by such objection are precluded on appeal.’” School Union No. 37 v. United Nat'l Ins. Co.,
617 F.3d 554, 564(1st Cir. 2010) (quoting Keating v. Secretary of Health & Human Servs.,
848 F.2d 271, 275(1st Cir. 1988)); see also United States v. Valencia- Copete,
792 F.2d 4, 6(1st Cir. 1986) (after proper notice, failure to file a specific objection to magistrate's report will waive the right to appeal).
_/_s_/_ _P_a_u_l_ _B_a_r_b_a_d_o_r_o__________ Paul Barbadoro United States District Judge Date: June 24, 2020 cc: Lynden Garfield Lorfils, pro se
Reference
- Status
- Unknown