Dandeneau v. FNU
Dandeneau v. FNU
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
Chad Dandeneau
v. Case No. 20-cv-370-JL
FNU LNU
ORDER
No objection having been filed, I herewith approve the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Andrea K. Johnstone dated June 1, 2020 . “‘[O]nly those issues fairly raised by the objections to the magistrate's report are subject to review in the district court and those not preserved by such objection are precluded on appeal.’” School Union No. 37 v. United Nat'l Ins. Co.,
617 F.3d 554, 564(1st Cir. 2010) (quoting Keating v. Secretary of Health & Human Servs.,
848 F.2d 271, 275(1st Cir. 1988)); see also United States v. Valencia- Copete,
792 F.2d 4, 6(1st Cir. 1986) (after proper notice, failure to file a specific objection to magistrate's report will waive the right to appeal). The court notes that the complaint itself suggests that the plaintiff might have qualified for in forma pauperis relief had he requested it. It is impossible for the court to ascertain that fact on this record. SO ORDERED.
____________________________ Joseph N. Laplante United States District Judge
Date: July 7, 2020
cc: Chad Dandeneau, pro se
Reference
- Status
- Unknown