Dandeneau v. FNU

District Court, D. New Hampshire

Dandeneau v. FNU

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Chad Dandeneau

v. Case No. 20-cv-370-JL

FNU LNU

ORDER

No objection having been filed, I herewith approve the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Andrea K. Johnstone dated June 1, 2020 . “‘[O]nly those issues fairly raised by the objections to the magistrate's report are subject to review in the district court and those not preserved by such objection are precluded on appeal.’” School Union No. 37 v. United Nat'l Ins. Co.,

617 F.3d 554, 564

(1st Cir. 2010) (quoting Keating v. Secretary of Health & Human Servs.,

848 F.2d 271, 275

(1st Cir. 1988)); see also United States v. Valencia- Copete,

792 F.2d 4, 6

(1st Cir. 1986) (after proper notice, failure to file a specific objection to magistrate's report will waive the right to appeal). The court notes that the complaint itself suggests that the plaintiff might have qualified for in forma pauperis relief had he requested it. It is impossible for the court to ascertain that fact on this record. SO ORDERED.

____________________________ Joseph N. Laplante United States District Judge

Date: July 7, 2020

cc: Chad Dandeneau, pro se

Reference

Status
Unknown