Widi v. Strafford County
Widi v. Strafford County
Trial Court Opinion
UNDIITSETDR ISCTTA TOEFS NDEIWS THRAIMCPTS HCIORUER T
David J. Widi, Jr. v. Case No. 13-cv-536-SM
Strafford County, et al
ORDER
No objection having been filed, I herewith approve the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Andrea K. Johnstone dated January 9, 2020, for the reasons set forth therein. Defendants’ motion to enforce settlement (Doc. No. 191) is granted. Parties shall confer, within fourteen days of the date of this Order, as to: 1) whether a replacement check is necessary, and if so, 2) plaintiff’s preferred method of delivery of the replacement check. “‘[O]nly those issues fairly raised by the objections to the magistrate's report are subject to review in the district court and those not preserved by such objection are precluded on appeal.’” School Union No. 37 v. United Nat'l Ins. Co.,
617 F.3d 554, 564(1st Cir. 2010) (quoting Keating v. Secretary of Health & Human Servs.,
848 F.2d 271, 275(1st Cir. 1988)); see also United States v. Valencia- 1 failure to file a specific objection to magistrate's report will waive the right to appeal).
____________________________ Steven J. McAuliffe United States District Judge
Date: January 28, 2020
cc: David J. Widi, Jr., pro se Anthony Sculimbrene, Esq. Corey M. Belobrow, Esq.
2
Reference
- Status
- Unknown