Kelley v. Russell
Kelley v. Russell
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
Karyn M. Kelley, et al. v. Case No. 20-cv-162-PB
Charles A. Russell, et al.
ORDER
As no objection having been filed as to the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Lynch dated September 8, 2020, and after due consideration of the objection filed as to the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Lynch dated May 4, 2020, I herewith approve the report and recommendations and dismiss the Trust’s claims without prejudice for failure to prosecute and deny as moot Plaintiff Trust’s Application to Proceed in District Court without Prepaying Fees or Costs (Doc. No. 3). “‘[O]nly those issues fairly raised by the objections to the magistrate's report are subject to review in the district court and those not preserved by such objection are precluded on appeal.’” School Union No. 37 v. United Nat'l Ins. Co.,
617 F.3d 554, 564(1st Cir. 2010) (quoting Keating v. Secretary of Health & Human Servs.,
848 F.2d 271, 275(1st Cir. 1988)); see also United States v. Valencia- Copete,
792 F.2d 4, 6(1st Cir. 1986) (after proper notice, failure to file a specific objection to magistrate's report will waive the right to appeal).
_/s/Paul Barbadoro______________ Paul Barbadoro United States District Judge
Date: October 13, 2020
cc: Karyn M. Kelley
Reference
- Status
- Unknown