Hart v. Rowe

District Court, D. New Hampshire

Hart v. Rowe

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Kenneth Hannibal Hart, Sr. v. Case No. 20-cv-417-LM Irene Brown Hart Rowe, et al.

ORDER No objection having been filed, I herewith approve the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Andrea K. Johnstone dated January 8, 2021. Plaintiff's Motion to Remove Multiple Defendants (doc no. 7)is granted and preliminary review

of the Complaint (1), pursuant to

28 U.S.C. §1915

, shall continue only with the following defendants: Irene Brown Hart Rowe; Kenneth Leon Hart; John Doe Bank, Hawthorne, FL; Jane Doe bank teller, Hawthorne, FL; John Doe identity theft fraud impersonator, Hawthorne, FL. “‘[O]nly those issues fairly raised by the objections to the magistrate's report are subject to review in the district court and those not preserved by such objection are precluded on appeal.’” School Union No. 37 v. United Nat'l Ins. Co.,

617 F.3d 554, 564

(1st Cir. 2010) (quoting Keating v. Secretary of Health & Human Servs.,

848 F.2d 271, 275

(1st Cir. 1988)); see also United States v. Valencia-

Copete,

792 F.2d 4, 6

(1st Cir. 1986) (after proper notice, failure to file a specific objection to magistrate's report will waive the right to appeal).

Lanayy B, fafferty Chief J ZY Date: February 2, 2021

cc: Kenneth Hannibal Hart, Sr., pro se

Reference

Status
Unknown