Lindsay v. Mulliens

District Court, D. New Hampshire

Lindsay v. Mulliens

Trial Court Opinion

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Anthony Lindsay v. Case No. 19-cv-1101-PB Warden, Federal Correctional Institution, Berlin, New Hampshire ORDER No objection having been filed, I herewith approve the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Andrea K. Johnstone dated February 26, 2021, grant the Warden’s motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 8) and dismiss Lindsay’s petition (Doc. No. 1), without prejudice to his ability to refile claims against a proper respondent in the district in which he is incarcerated. “‘[O]nly those issues fairly raised by the objections to the magistrate's report are subject to review in the district court

and those not preserved by such objection are precluded on appeal.’” School Union No. 37 v. United Nat'l Ins. Co.,

617 F.3d 554, 564

(1st Cir. 2010) (quoting Keating v. Secretary of Health & Human Servs.,

848 F.2d 271, 275

(1st Cir. 1988)); see also United States v. Valencia-Copete,

792 F.2d 4, 6

(1st Cir. 1986) (after proper notice, failure to file a specific objection to magistrate's report will waive the right to appeal).

__/_s_/_P_a_u_l_ _B_a_r_b_a_d_o_r_o__________ Paul Barbadoro United States District Judge Date: April 21, 2021

Reference

Status
Unknown