Polansky v. NH, State of
Polansky v. NH, State of
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Christopher Polansky v. Case No. 20-cv-1103-JL State of NH ORDER No objection having been filed, I herewith approve the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Andrea K. Johnstone dated March 15, 2021 . “‘[O]Jnly those issues fairly raised by the objections to the magistrate's report are subject to review in the district court and those not preserved by such objection are precluded on appeal.’” School Union No. 37 v. United Nat'l Ins. Co.,
617 F.3d 554, 564(1st Cir. 2010) (quoting Keating v. Secretary of Health & Human Servs.,
848 F.2d 271, 275(1st Cir. 1988)); see also United States v. Valencia-Copete,
792 F.2d 4, 6(1st Cir. 1986) (after proper notice, failure to file a specific objection to magistrate's report will waive the right to appeal). Additionally, finding that the petitioner has failed to make substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, the court declines to issue a certificate of appealability. See
28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); Rule 11, Rules Governing Habeas Corpus Cases Under Section 2254; First Cir. LR 22.0.
SO ORDERED. ote nited States District Judge Date: May 11, 2021 cc: Christopher Polansky, pro se
Reference
- Status
- Unknown