Pennix v. FCI Berlin, Warden

District Court, D. New Hampshire

Pennix v. FCI Berlin, Warden

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Pierre Pennix v. Case No. 1:23-cv-00063-PB FCI Berlin, Warden

ORDER No objection having been filed, I herewith approve the Endorsed Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Andrea K. Johnstone dated July 16, 2023, dismiss this action without prejudice for failure to prosecute, and direct the clerk to enter judgment and close the case. “‘[O]nly those issues fairly raised by the objections to the magistrate's report are subject to review in the district court and those not preserved by such objection are precluded on appeal.’” School Union No. 37 v. United Nat'l Ins. Co.,

617 F.3d 554, 564

(1st Cir. 2010) (quoting Keating v. Secretary of Health & Human Servs.,

848 F.2d 271, 275

(1st Cir. 1988)); see also United States v. Valencia- Copete,

792 F.2d 4, 6

(1st Cir. 1986) (after proper notice, failure to file a specific objection to magistrate's report will waive the right to appeal). __/_s_/_P_a_u_l_ _B_a_r_b_a_d_o_r_o__________ Paul J. Barbadoro United States District Judge Date: August 17, 2023 cc: Pierre Pennix, pro se

Reference

Status
Unknown