Caceres v. FCI Berlin, Warden
Caceres v. FCI Berlin, Warden
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Richard Caceres v. Case No. 23-cv-00058-PB-AJ FCI Berlin, Warden
ORDER No objection having been filed, I herewith approve the Endorsed Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Andrea K. Johnstone dated August 11, 2023, deny petitioner's motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 8), and grant respondent's motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 9). The clerk of court shall enter judgment and close this case. “‘[O]nly those issues fairly raised by the objections to the magistrate's report are subject to review in the district court and those not preserved by such objection are precluded on appeal.’” School Union No. 37 v. United Nat'l Ins. Co.,
617 F.3d 554, 564(1st Cir. 2010) (quoting Keating v. Secretary of Health & Human Servs.,
848 F.2d 271, 275(1st Cir. 1988)); see also United States v. Valencia- Copete,
792 F.2d 4, 6(1st Cir. 1986) (after proper notice, failure to file a specific objection to magistrate's report will waive the right to appeal). __/_s_/_P_a_u_l_ _B_a_r_b_a_d_o_r_o__________ Paul J. Barbadoro United States District Judge Date: September 13, 2023 cc: Richard Caceres, pro se Counsel of Record
Reference
- Status
- Unknown