Meran-Montero v. FCI Berlin, Warden
Meran-Montero v. FCI Berlin, Warden
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
Francisco A. Meran-Montero
v. Case No. 23-cv-219-LM
FCI Berlin, Warden
ORDER
No objection having been filed, I herewith approve the Endorsed Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Andrea K. Johnstone dated July 6, 2023. For the reasons explained therein, Meran-Montero’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (doc. no. [1]) is dismissed as moot. The respondent’s motion to dismiss (doc. no. [4]) and the petitioner’s emergency motion to take judicial notice (doc. no.[5]) are denied as moot. “[O]nly those issues fairly raised by the objections to the magistrate’s report are subject to review in the district court and those not preserved by such objection are precluded on appeal.” Sch. Union No. 37 v. United Nat’l Ins. Co.,
617 F.3d 554, 564(1st Cir. 2010) (quotation omitted); see United States v. Valencia-Copete,
792 F.2d 4, 6(1st Cir. 1986) (after proper notice, failure to file a specific objection to magistrate’s report will waive the right to appeal). The clerk is directed to enter judgment and close this case. SO ORDERED.
/s/ Landya B. McCafferty Landya B. McCafferty Chief Judge Date: August 2, 2023
cc: Francisco A. Meran-Montero, pro se Counsel of Record
Reference
- Status
- Unknown