Araujo v. FCI Berlin, Warden
Araujo v. FCI Berlin, Warden
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Albert Araujo v. Case No. 23-cv-453-PB-TSM FCI Berlin, Warden
ORDER No objection having been filed, I herewith approve the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Talesha L. Saint-Marc dated December 14, 2023, and grant the Warden’s motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 5). The clerk shall enter judgment and close the case. “‘[O]nly those issues fairly raised by the objections to the magistrate's report are subject to review in the district court and those not preserved by such objection are precluded on appeal.’” School Union No. 37 v. United Nat'l Ins. Co.,
617 F.3d 554, 564(1st Cir. 2010) (quoting Keating v. Secretary of Health & Human Servs.,
848 F.2d 271, 275(1st Cir. 1988)); see also United States v. Valencia- Copete,
792 F.2d 4, 6(1st Cir. 1986) (after proper notice, failure to file a specific objection to magistrate's report will waive the right to appeal). __/_s_/_P_a_u_l_ _B_a_r_b_a_d_o_r_o__________ Paul J. Barbadoro United States District Judge Date: January 17, 2024 cc: Albert Araujo, pro se
Reference
- Status
- Unknown