Acosta-Reyes v. FCI Berlin, Warden
Acosta-Reyes v. FCI Berlin, Warden
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Luis Acosta-Reyes v. Case No. 1:23-cv-96-PB-AJ FCI Berlin
ORDER No objection having been filed, I herewith approve the Endorsed Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Andrea K. Johnstone dated January 10, 2024, and grant the motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 5). The clerk of court is directed to enter judgment and close the case. “‘[O]nly those issues fairly raised by the objections to the magistrate's report are subject to review in the district court and those not preserved by such objection are precluded on appeal.’” School Union No. 37 v. United Nat'l Ins. Co.,
617 F.3d 554, 564(1st Cir. 2010) (quoting Keating v. Secretary of Health & Human Servs.,
848 F.2d 271, 275(1st Cir. 1988)); see also United States v. Valencia- Copete,
792 F.2d 4, 6(1st Cir. 1986) (after proper notice, failure to file a specific objection to magistrate's report will waive the right to appeal). ___/_s_/_P_a_u_l_ _B_a_r_b_a_d_o_r_o_________ Paul J. Barbadoro United States District Judge Date: February 7, 2024 cc: Luis Acosta-Reyes, pro se Counsel of Record
Reference
- Status
- Unknown