Strom v. FCI Berlin, Warden
Strom v. FCI Berlin, Warden
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
Justin Deonta Strom
v. Case No. 23-cv-176-LM
FCI Berlin, Warden
ORDER
No objection having been filed, I herewith approve the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Andrea K. Johnstone dated February 12, 2024 . “‘[O]nly those issues fairly raised by the objections to the magistrate's report are subject to review in the district court and those not preserved by such objection are precluded on appeal.’” School Union No. 37 v. United Nat'l Ins. Co.,
617 F.3d 554, 564(1st Cir. 2010) (quoting Keating v. Secretary of Health & Human Servs.,
848 F.2d 271, 275(1st Cir. 1988)); see also United States v. Valencia- Copete,
792 F.2d 4, 6(1st Cir. 1986) (after proper notice, failure to file a specific objection to magistrate's report will waive the right to appeal). The Warden’s motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 5) is denied without prejudice to his ability to file a motion for summary judgment on the merits. The respondent is directed, within thirty days of the date of the order, to either file a motion for summary judgment on the merits of Strom’s claims or advise the court that an evidentiary hearing is necessary to resolve those claims. <7.) _ £4 4 Landya B égCafferty United Stz#¥es District Judge Date: March 13, 2024
ec: Justin Deonta Strom, pro se Counsel of Record
Reference
- Status
- Unknown