Superior Court of New Hampshire, 1808

Kingsbury v. Cooke

Kingsbury v. Cooke
Superior Court of New Hampshire · Decided May 15, 1808 · Pee
1 Smith & H. 217

Counsel

Newcomb, for plaintiff., Cooke, for himself.

Kingsbury v. Cooke

Opinion of the Court

Pee Curiam.

The statute, ed. 1805, p. 88, contains no exception for the case of set-offs. The indorser is bound to pay all the costs that plaintiff [defendant] shall recover in the action. The indorser must be supposed conusant of the law, as he was himself a lawyer; and of the defendant’s right to plead a set-off.

The second plea goes to show that no judgment should have been rendered. It is enough for us to know that a judgment was, in fact, rendered for the defendant. We cannot, on this scire facias, inquire into the merits of that judgment.

Judgment for plaintiff.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.