Superior Court of New Hampshire, 1818

Sabin v. Gilman

Sabin v. Gilman
Superior Court of New Hampshire · Decided September 15, 1818
1 N.H. 193

Counsel

(S'. Moody, for the plaintiff., J. P. Hale and J. Woodman, for the defendant.

Sabin v. Gilman

Opinion of the Court

Per curiam.

It has long been settled, in this state, that neither an executor nor an-administrator can prosecute an action in our courts by virtue of letters granted to him under the authority of another state. 3 Mass. Rep. 514, Goodwin vs. Jones. 1 Cranch 259, Fenwick vs. Sears, admin*194istrator. — 3 Cranch 319, Dixon’s Executors vs. Ramsay’s Executors. The replication is insufficient, and the .defendant is entitled to judgment.

Judgmen t for the defendant.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.