Pickett v. King
Pickett v. King
4 N.H. 212
Opinion of the Court
We are of opinion that the motion of the demandants cannot be legally sustained. The cases to which we have been referred seem to show the practice to be in Massachusetts, to strike out the name of a party by way of amendment. But the practice is believed to be peculiar to that state. No authority is cited to warrant it in the cases which have been cited. In this state no such practice has ever prevailed.
Leave to amend refused, and demandants nonsuit.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.