Superior Court of New Hampshire, 1831

Brown v. Copp

Brown v. Copp
Superior Court of New Hampshire · Decided January 15, 1831
5 N.H. 346

Counsel

Lyford, for the plaintiff., Cogswell, for the defendant.

Brown v. Copp

Opinion of the Court

By the court.

We are of opinion that the replication in this case is sufficient. The extended time for making the award may be considered as a substitution for the time mentioned in the condition, and then the remedy upon the bond is the same as if the extended time had been originally in the condition. There is no doubt, that a defeasance may be made or altered, after the obligation is executed. The case of Creig v. Talbot, 2 B. & C. 119, is an authority directly in point.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.