Superior Court of New Hampshire, 1832

Burnham v. Savings Bank for Strafford

Burnham v. Savings Bank for Strafford
Superior Court of New Hampshire · Decided January 15, 1832
5 N.H. 573

Counsel

F. Smith, for the plaintiff,, Ilodgdon and Christie, for the corporation.

Burnham v. Savings Bank for Strafford

Opinion of the Court

By the court.

The mistake in the writ is clearly amendable, and tile plaintiff has leave to amend his writ. 10 Mass. Rep. 203, Kincaid v. Howe; 5 ditto, 99, Bullard v. The Nantucket Bank; 11 ditto, 338, Sherman v. C. R. Bridge.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.