Superior Court of New Hampshire, 1832

Rand v. Sherman

Rand v. Sherman
Superior Court of New Hampshire · Decided May 15, 1832
6 N.H. 29

Counsel

J. Smith, for the demandant., Goodall and Woods, for the tenant.

Rand v. Sherman

Opinion of the Court

13y the court.

In practice, it has rarely, if ever, happened, of late years, that a writ of attachment has been used, in the commencement of a real action. The process in common use, in such cases, has been a summons. But we see no reason why a writ of attachment may not be used. In personal actions, goods and estate may be attached, and held to pay the costs, as well as the debt or damage. We are, on the whole, of opinion that the plea must be adjudged insufficient.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.