Superior Court of New Hampshire, 1845

Lord v. State

Lord v. State
Superior Court of New Hampshire · Decided January 15, 1845 · Gilchrist
20 N.H. 404

Counsel

Sale and Wiggins, for the prisoner., Walker, attorney-general, for the State.

Lord v. State

Opinion of the Court

Gilchrist, J.

The indictment should contain a description of the pieces of silver stolen. ' In Rex v. Fry, cited in Russell on Crimes 109, it was held that “ten pounds in monies numbered,” was bad upon a motion in arrest of judgment.

In this State, in the county of Carroll, it has lately been held, that “ sundry pieces of silver coin, current by law within this State, amounting together to the sum of twelve dollars, of the goods, chattels and monies of &c.,” was an insufficient description of property alleged to have been stolen.

The authorities show that a defect of this kind is not cured by a verdict, and by reason of it the judgment must be reversed; and it is unnecessary to inquire into the other ground of error.

Judgment reversed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.