Gilman v. Bartlett

The question arising in this case was considered by the court in Sanborn v. Pease, in the county of Rockingham; when it was held that by the terms of the Rev. Stat., ch. 175, sec. 7, requiring the appellant to enter into recognizance with “ sufficient sureties,” there must be more sureties than one. The appeal, therefore, not having been regularly granted, must be dismissed.

Appeal dismissed.