Superior Court of New Hampshire, 1850

Gookin v. Upham

Gookin v. Upham
Superior Court of New Hampshire · Decided December 15, 1850 · Perlet
22 N.H. 38

Counsel

Jenness, for the plaintiff., Hatch and Christie, for the defendant.

Gookin v. Upham

Opinion of the Court

Perlet, J.

The Revised Statutes, ch. 191, <§> 7, give the Court power in all actions and petitions, “ to order such security for costs as they may deem just and reasonable.”

In this case the plaintiff is shown to be insolvent, and the suit is prosecuted in his name for the benefit of his assignees. We think it just and reasonable that the defendant should have security for his costs.

Motion allowed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.