Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1876

Sleeper v. Free Bapt. Assoc'n

Sleeper v. Free Bapt. Assoc'n
Supreme Court of New Hampshire · Decided December 5, 1876 · Bingham, Stanley
58 N.H. 27
Sleeper v. Free Bapt. Assoc'n

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Bingham, J.

The defendants are a corporation located in the state. The statute required the writ to be served by an attested copy. Gen. St., c. 204, ss. 12, 14. A service made by summons is insufficient. Bell v. Somerby, 8 N. H. 64; Foster v. Hadduck, 6 N. H. 217; Hayward v. Hartshorn, 3 N. H. 198.

The writ should have been duly served on the defendants twenty-eight days before the court to which it was returnable. Gen. St., c. 204, s. 1.

*28 The defendants could not be legally notified to answer to the action, as ruled at the trial term. Jones v. Smith, 3 N. H. 108 ; Kendrick v. Kimball, 33 N. H. 484; Nelson v. Swett, 4 N. H. 256; Arnold v. Tourtellot, 13 Pick. 172.

Action dismissed.

Stanley, J., did not sit.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.