Bedford v. Rice

Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Bedford v. Rice, 58 N.H. 446 (N.H. 1878)
Allen, Stanley, Clark

Bedford v. Rice

Opinion of the Court

Allen, J.

The plaintiff town having chosen no health officers, the selectmen were, by law, such officers. Gen. St., c. 37, s. 4. In case of a vacancy in the office the selectmen could appoint. Gen. St., c. 39, s. 1. By appointing others to the office the selectmen resigned it, and a vacancy existed which was filled by the appointment.

It was sufficient that the persons appointed were health officers de facto. They were not parties to the suit, and the rights of the public and third persons were in question, and the title to the office could not be contested in this case. Tucker v. Aiken, 7 N. H. 113, 131; Blake v. Sturtevant, 12 N. H. 573; Carr v. Dodge, 40 N. H. 403, 409; Prescott v. Hayes, 42 N. H. 56, 58; State v. Carroll, 38 Conn. 449; Brown v. O’ Connell, 36 Conn. 432.

Exception overruled.

Stanley and Clark, JJ., did not sit.

Reference

Full Case Name
Bedford v. Rice.
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published