Burns v. Madigan
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Burns v. Madigan, 60 N.H. 197 (N.H. 1880)
Aubun, Clark
Burns v. Madigan
Opinion of the Court
Without a contract, express or to be inferred, the plaintiff cannot recover. Kelley v. Davis, 49 N. H. 187, 189; Bundy v. Hyde, 50 N. N. 116; Cook v. Bennett, 51 N. H. 85, 93.
Without the consent of the defendant, the plaintiff could not be permitted to testify, except upon matters to which the testatrix, if living, could not testify. Chandler v. Davis, 47 N. H. 462; Harvey v. Hilliard, 47 N. H. 551; Fosgate v. Thompson, 54 N. H. 455; Hoit v. Russell, 56 N. H. 559. It does not appear that the plaintiff offered to testify to matters arising subsequent to the death of the testatrix; and no injustice appearing to be done wdthout the plaintiff’s testimony, there was no error in its exclusion.
Judgment on the report for the defendant.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Burns v. Madigan, Ex'r.
- Cited By
- 4 cases
- Status
- Published