Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1882

Jackman v. Eastman

Jackman v. Eastman
Supreme Court of New Hampshire · Decided June 5, 1882 · Clark, Blodgett, Carpenter
62 N.H. 273

Jackman v. Eastman

Opinion of the Court

Clark, J.

The condition of the bond issued under the 36th rule in chancery is, “ to pay and satisfy all such damages as may be occasioned to the adverse party by reason of the injunction.” What damages were occasioned to the plaintiffs by reason of the injunction, is a question of fact to be determined at the trial term. We cannot say as matter of law what damages were so occasioned.

Case discharged.

Blodgett and Carpenter, JJ., did not sit: the others concurred.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.