Singer Manufacturing Co. v. Bullard
Singer Manufacturing Co. v. Bullard
62 N.H. 129
Singer Manufacturing Co. v. Bullard
Opinion of the Court
The machine was the property of the plaintiffs, whether the agreement is regarded as a lease or as a conditional sale. The title would not pass until the price was paid in full. Upon a demand of payment, and a refusal to comply within a reasonable time, or to deliver up the machine, the plaintiffs had a right to replevy it. Bailey v. Colby, 34 N. H. 29; Singer M’f’g Co. v. Graham, 8 Oreg. 17—S. C., 34 Am. Rep. 572.
Exceptions overruled.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.